Empirical and Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Nonlinear Option Pricing Models (Quantum-Based and Heston) and Conventional Linear Models (Black–Scholes and Binomial Tree) in the Tehran Stock Exchange

Authors

    Vahideh Khajepour Department of Financial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
    Gholamreza Askarzadeh Dareh * Department of Financial Management, Ya .C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran. GR.askarzadeh@iau.ac.ir
    Hamid Khajeh Mahmoudabadi Department of Financial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
    Sayed Yahya Abtahi Department of Financial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Keywords:

Option Pricing, Black–Scholes Model, Binomial Tree Model, Heston Model, Quantum Model (Nonlinear Schrödinger), Method of Lines, Runge–Kutta, Python.

Abstract

Accurate option pricing, as one of the key tools for risk management and price discovery, requires the use of models capable of adapting to nonlinear behaviors and structured market volatilities. The present study aims to empirically evaluate the efficiency of both linear and nonlinear option pricing models in the Iranian market by examining four analytical frameworks: Black–Scholes and the Binomial Tree as linear models, and Heston and an extended quantum model based on the nonlinear Schrödinger equation as nonlinear models. The research data include 30 actively traded call option contracts listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, each with a minimum of 70 trading days during the period from 2016 to 2022. In the numerical solution section, the quantum and Heston models were implemented using the method of lines and the fourth-order Runge–Kutta algorithm in a Python programming environment. The comparative evaluation criteria consisted of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Out-of-sample results indicate that, under most conditions—particularly for at-the-money (ATM) options and in high-volatility environments—the quantum model provides the most accurate estimates. The Heston model demonstrates competitive performance at medium maturities and moderate volatility levels; the Binomial Tree model performs comparably to the benchmark over short horizons; and the Black–Scholes model, overall, exhibits the lowest accuracy. Moreover, employing nonlinear frameworks not only reduces pricing deviation but also leads to relative savings in computational costs compared to linear iterations based on implied volatility extraction. This study is also distinguished from a computational perspective, as it represents the first application in Iranian option pricing literature that integrates the method of lines and Runge–Kutta within a Python-based numerical implementation, moving beyond the traditional reliance on regression-based and curve-fitting techniques. Although the limited depth of Iran’s derivatives market, trading halts, and the absence of a comprehensive structured data repository remain research challenges, the findings suggest that employing nonlinear models—particularly those based on quantum dynamics—can provide a novel pathway toward fair pricing, the design of effective hedging strategies, and the advancement of financial engineering in the Iranian market.

References

P. Abad, "A Deeper Theoretical Understanding of the Capital Asset Pricing Model," 2025.

E. Weinan, T. Li, and E. Vanden-Eijden, Applied Stochastic Analysis. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 2019.

G. Askarzadeh and K. Nasiri, "Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of the Black-Scholes and Binomial Tree Pricing Models for Call Option Transactions in the Tehran Stock Exchange," Quarterly Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, vol. 54, pp. 25-xx, 2023.

S. Zamani and B. Zargari, "A Difference Scheme for Option Pricing in the Stochastic Volatility Model," International Journal of Engineering Science, Iran University of Science & Technology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 87-93, 2008.

S. A. Nabavi Chashmi and F. Abdollahi, "Investigation and Comparison of Profitability of Asian, European, and American Stock Options in the Tehran Stock Exchange," vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 359-380, 2018.

A. Nisi and M. Peimani, "Modeling the Tehran Stock Exchange General Index Using the Heston Stochastic Differential Equation," Journal of Economic Research, vol. 14, no. 53, pp. 143-166, 2014.

F. Mehrdust and N. Saber, "Option Pricing Under the Double Heston Model with Jump," Journal of Advanced Mathematical Modeling, pp. 45-60, 2013.

R. Khezripour Gharayi, S. Sattardabaghi, and Ghasemi, "A Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation and Finite Difference Methods in Valuing Double Barrier Options in the Discrete Case," in Third Conference on Financial Mathematics and Applications, Tehran, 2012, pp. 12-21.

O. Vukovic, "On the Interconnectedness of Schrödinger and Black-Scholes Equation," Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol. 3, pp. 1108-1113, 2015, doi: 10.4236/jamp.2015.39137.

M. Wroblewski, "Quantum physics methods in share option valuation," Technical Transactions Automatic Control, vol. 2-AC/2013, pp. 23-40, 2013.

M. Wroblewski, "Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing," Open Physics, vol. 15, pp. 280-291, 2017, doi: 10.1515/phys-2017-0031.

M. Wroblewski and A. Myśliński, "Nonlinear Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model based on Quantum Dynamics," in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Complexity, Future Information Systems and Risk - COMPLEXIS, 2022: SciTePress, doi: 10.5220/0011066000003197.

M. Wroblewski and A. Myśliński, "Quantum Dynamics approach for non-linear Black-Scholes option pricing," 2023.

V. G. Ivancevic and T. T. Ivancevic, Quantum Neural Computation. Springer Science, 2010.

E. Paquet and F. Soleyman, "Quantum Leap: Hybrid quantum neural network for financial predictions," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 195, p. 116583, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116583.

A. Kartono and et al., "Numerical Solution of Nonlinear Schrödinger Approaches Using the Fourth-Order Runge-Kutta Method for Predicting Stock Pricing," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1491, p. 012021, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012021.

M. Khalili Araghi and et al., "Pricing of Taba'i (Follower) Securities Using the Heston Model," Science and Research University of Tehran, 2016.

V. Khodadadi, S. Lashgarara, E. Mazaheri, and M. Ayatimehr, "Modeling Stock Price Crash Risk Dependency Using a Conditional Copula-GARCH Approach and Its Relationship with Rational Pricing Structure," Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-32, 2024.

Y. Xu, "Comparison Between Different Pricing Models: Evidence From the Technology Industry," Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 222-230, 2024, doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/59/20231126.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

Submitted

2025-07-14

Revised

2025-10-28

Accepted

2025-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khajepour, V. ., Askarzadeh Dareh, G., Khajeh Mahmoudabadi, H. ., & Abtahi, S. Y. . (2026). Empirical and Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Nonlinear Option Pricing Models (Quantum-Based and Heston) and Conventional Linear Models (Black–Scholes and Binomial Tree) in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Business, Marketing, and Finance Open, 1-16. https://www.bmfopen.com/index.php/bmfopen/article/view/342

Similar Articles

11-20 of 189

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.