Application of Sandelowski and Barroso’s Technique in Identifying the Components of Decision-Making and Judgment Behavior among Auditors and Tax Inspectors Based on Cognition and Metacognition
Keywords:
auditor decision-making, professional judgment, auditors and tax inspectors, cognitive and metacognitive awarenessAbstract
Judgment and decision-making are complex processes influenced by numerous factors. Existing research and literature indicate that both internal and external elements significantly impact judgment. Auditing, as a form of judgment, is no exception. Therefore, the present study aims to apply the meta-synthesis technique to identify the components of decision-making and judgment behavior among auditors and tax inspectors, grounded in cognitive and metacognitive domains. By employing a systematic review and meta-synthesis approach, the researcher analyzed the findings of previous studies and utilized the seven-step Sandelowski and Barroso method to identify the influencing factors. From an initial pool of 553 articles, 51 were selected using the CASP method. The validity of the analysis was confirmed with a Kappa coefficient of 0.747. To ensure reliability and quality control, transcript-based methods were applied, with results showing an excellent level of agreement for the identified indicators. Data analysis conducted using MAXQDA software led to the identification of 69 initial concepts across 18 indicators, which were categorized into 6 dimensions. Based on the meta-synthesis technique, these six dimensions were structured according to the identified concepts. The six dimensions include: cognitive dimensions, metacognitive dimensions, knowledge-based dimensions, standards and regulations, workload pressure, and organizational context. The study's findings demonstrate that the decision-making and judgment of auditors and tax inspectors are influenced by a variety of factors, which are categorized into six main dimensions. To enhance auditors’ professional judgment, it is essential for organizations and relevant institutions to adopt a comprehensive approach. This should include ongoing training, strengthening of cognitive and metacognitive skills, updating professional knowledge, adherence to standards and regulations, managing workload pressure, and improving organizational conditions. These measures can contribute to greater accuracy and reliability in tax and audit assessments, ultimately reinforcing public trust in the auditing profession.
References
M. Vatanparast, M. Ebrahimi, and Rezaeifarzin, "Designing a Model of Bias in Tax Officers and Auditors Using a Grounded Theory Approach," Scientific-Research Quarterly of Accounting and Auditing Knowledge Management, vol. 10, no. 39, 2021.
M. Vatanparast, M. Ebrahimi, Rezaeifarzin, and F. Mohammadi Nodeh, "Factors Influencing Tax Auditors' Bias in Professional Judgments," Accounting and Auditing Reviews, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 181-205, 2021.
V. N. Chukwuani and D. Deliu, "Emotional Intelligence and Its Impact on Ethical Decision-Making in Accounting Elevating professional reasoning in auditing. Psycho-professional factors affecting auditor's professional judgement and skepticism," Contemporary Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15-30, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo, 13353901, 2 10.5171/2020.804680.
Z. Kohandel, M. Doaei, and L. Zamanianfar, "The Effectiveness of Cognitive Biases on Audit Errors Based on Structural Equation Modeling," Investment Knowledge, vol. 14, no. 56, pp. 507-526, 2025.
A. Samagaio and T. Felício, "The influence of the auditor's personality in audit quality," Journal of Business Research, vol. 141, pp. 794-807, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.082.
L. Alizadegan, M. Samadi Largani, and M. Imani, "Analyzing Auditors' Ability to Detect Fraud Using the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Impact of Auditor Experience and Personality Type with the Role of Professional Skepticism," Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 149EP - 184, 2023.
M. Filsaraei and M. S. Sadeghi, "The Impact of Professional Ethics, Social Structure, and Religious Attitude on Auditors' Judgments: A Comparison of the Environments in India and Iran," Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 51-69, 2024.
H. Valiyan and M. Safari Gerayli, "Job stress analysis and simulation in the auditing profession: a dynamic systems modeling approach," Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, vol. 11, no. 42, pp. 41-57, 2022.
C. Santos and P. Cunha, "Influence of trust, time pressure and complexity factors in judgment and decision-making in auditing," BBR. Brazilian Business Review, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 605-623, 2021, doi: 10.15728/bbr.2021.18.6.1.
F. Liu, R. Mala, P. Chand, and J. Dumay, "Group judgments and decision-making in accounting: enhancing the financial reporting judgments of accountants," Journal of Accounting Literature, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JAL-07-2024-0176.
Y. Kamyabi, E. Melkian, and A. Javadi Nia, "Examining the Role of Experience and Professional Skepticism in Reducing the Effect of Information Presentation Format on Auditors' Judgment Quality: A Laboratory Study of Auditor Behavior," Financial Accounting Knowledge, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-37, 2023.
R. Haghighi, M. A. A. Bagherpour Velashani, A. Ghanaei Chamanabad, and M. R. Abbaszadeh, "Extending and Ranking the Audit Judgment Factors in an Emerging Market With an Emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience," Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 549-566, 2023.
L. Mellado and L. Parte, "Images of the auditor's job and associated emotions: a dynamic analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03722-xER -.
T. O. Fagbemi, "IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, DEMOGRAPHICAL AND PERSONAL FACTORS ON AUDITORS'ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN NIGERIA," Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldiş, Arad-Seria Ştiinţe Economice, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 35-58, 2020, doi: 10.2478/sues-2020-0016.
R. Mala and P. Chand, "Judgment and decision‐making research in auditing and accounting: future research implications of person, task, and environment perspective," Accounting Perspectives, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-50, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1911-3838.12040.
A. Hamdam, R. Jusoh, Y. Yahya, A. Abdul Jalil, and N. H. Zainal Abidin, "Auditor judgment and decision-making in big data environment: a proposed research framework," Accounting Research Journal, vol. 35IS - 1, pp. 55-70, 2022, doi: 10.1108/ARJ-04-2020-0078.
S. Hormozi, H. Nikoumaram, R. Royaei, and F. Rahnamay Roudposhti, "Examining the Impact of Psychological Biases on Auditors' Professional Skepticism," Experimental Accounting Researches, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 123-148, 2016.
E. Karami and B. Parvizi, "Examining Cognitive Biases in Auditors' Professional Judgment," Kurdistan University, 2017.
G. Gomraki, H. Behzadi, R. Fattahi, and J. Salehi Fardardi, "The Role of Demographic Variables in the Frequency of Cognitive Biases in the Information Retrieval Process," Processing and Information Management (Information Science and Technology), vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 127-154, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammadreza Mehranifar (Author); Sadegh Rahimi ; Abbas Ali Pouraghajan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
